As announced in the video, the Wuhan Flu panic comes with a challenge and an opportunity. And you will make the decision on which one should be followed.
The arguments:
For Sweden:
- It’s the story of the moment (regardless of how the outcome will look like)
- It’s clearly doable (from a logistical standpoint)
- Offers the opportunity to get the content that wasn’t possible in the previous Swedish tour (2017)
- Offers the opportunity to get incontrovertible evidence about the Swedish approach to the Wuhan Flu. Everyone speculates – why not go and find out from the field?
Against the Coronachan Swedish Tour 2020:
- It’s expensive. Not gigantically expensive, but enough to push the either/or approach
For sticking with the original plan:
- It has been promised
- Those who donated for the Gulag may not be interested in the Swedish igloo
- While the Uzbek part of the plan is in doubt, the main point (the Gulags) is very likely doable as planned
Against sticking with the original plan
- Flights will be more expensive
- The theme is not timely and it can wait another year
- Uzbekistan may not allow tourism in due time to stick with the original plan
- More unforeseen troubles (e.g. random rules changed without notice)
The polls will be open for 5 days – until April 26th, 2020 at 23:59, Romania time (GMT+2).
While the popular vote matters, priority will be given to the donors’ vote because it is only fair for the donors to get a larger say into the final decision.
Those who wish to vote in the donors’ poll and haven’t been contacted yet, are kindly asked to use the Contact form.
Not particularly nice. Mostly libertarian-conservative. Founder of the Freedom Alternative Network.